Details
From the "coders" mailing list
This is not the first time such a request has come up. As we
presumably wish to encourage users to perform convergence
testing, I have a suggestion. How about two new tasks?
task : cutoff_test
perform a series of singlepoint runs using FINITE_BASIS_NPOINTS
and FINITE_BASIS_SPACING, printing the force and stress at each
cutoff energy. Better still, have some new variables to define the
range.
task : kpoint_test
perform a series of singlepoint runs for a range of MP grid
sizes/spacings. Re-using the density could make this reasonably
efficient if elec_method=DM is used. (I assume that wave_reassign
would not help in this case??)
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think this is quite what we want as this will fix the grids, which
isn't the same as if the user performed a series of single-point energy
runs. However I agree with the spirit of the suggestions.
> task : kpoint_test
[snip]
> (I assume that wave_reassign would not help in this case??)
Not yet, but wave_copy would.
Phil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like a sensible suggestion for v4.5 - put it on the "feature
request" list. It is too late in the v4.4 development cycle to implement
this properly now - there are issues with grids, etc. but these can all
be fixed. In the meantime, I've uncommented the 'hack' I mentioned to
Charles and made it devel_code dependent so that MS users can (sort of)
get access to this functionality in v4.4. Hence adding
devel_code = FBSC_FORCES
to the .param file in v4.4 onwards will turn on forces & stresses during
the FBSC calculation.
Matt
|
Details
From the "coders" mailing list
This is not the first time such a request has come up. As we
presumably wish to encourage users to perform convergence
testing, I have a suggestion. How about two new tasks?
task : cutoff_test
perform a series of singlepoint runs using FINITE_BASIS_NPOINTS
and FINITE_BASIS_SPACING, printing the force and stress at each
cutoff energy. Better still, have some new variables to define the
range.
task : kpoint_test
perform a series of singlepoint runs for a range of MP grid
sizes/spacings. Re-using the density could make this reasonably
efficient if elec_method=DM is used. (I assume that wave_reassign
would not help in this case??)
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think this is quite what we want as this will fix the grids, which
isn't the same as if the user performed a series of single-point energy
runs. However I agree with the spirit of the suggestions.
> task : kpoint_test
[snip]
> (I assume that wave_reassign would not help in this case??)
Not yet, but wave_copy would.
Phil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like a sensible suggestion for v4.5 - put it on the "feature
request" list. It is too late in the v4.4 development cycle to implement
this properly now - there are issues with grids, etc. but these can all
be fixed. In the meantime, I've uncommented the 'hack' I mentioned to
Charles and made it devel_code dependent so that MS users can (sort of)
get access to this functionality in v4.4. Hence adding
devel_code = FBSC_FORCES
to the .param file in v4.4 onwards will turn on forces & stresses during
the FBSC calculation.
Matt
|